Why the cell manufacturer matters more than the container brand
Cells account for 55–65% of system value and are the only component that can't be replaced without dismantling the modules. The integrator can change, but the cell stays in the installation for 15–20 years — that's why we always specify the exact manufacturer and model in our offer.
Cell comparison table
| Manufacturer | Model | Capacity | Cycles | Warranty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATL | EnerC / EnerOne (306–314 Ah) | 306 / 314 Ah | 8,000–10,000 | 10 years / 70% SOH |
| EVE Energy | LF628 | 628 Ah | 10,000 | 10 years / 70% SOH |
| Hithium | MIC 1130 | 1,130 Ah | 11,000 | 12 years / 70% SOH |
| BYD | Blade 2 | 710 Ah | 10,000 | 10 years / 70% SOH |
| REPT Battero | Wending 320 | 320 Ah | 8,000 | 10 years / 70% SOH |
| CALB | L500 | 587 Ah | 10,000 | 10 years / 70% SOH |
CATL — EnerC and EnerOne series
The most widely used reference in grid-scale projects. The 306–314 Ah cells deliver 5.0–5.6 MWh in a 20ft container, backed by a very large installed base and predictable servicing.
EVE Energy — 628 Ah cells
Double the cell capacity means fewer interconnections and less parameter spread within the string. The container reaches 6.25 MWh in the same footprint.
Hithium — MIC 1130 Ah for 4–8 h storage
A 1,130 Ah cell designed for long discharge durations. It enables 6.9 MWh in a 20ft unit with a claimed 11,000 cycles, lowering LCOS in 4-hour projects.
BYD — Blade 2, 710 Ah
A prismatic design with a large heat-dissipation surface, pairing well with liquid cooling at 0.5C.
How to verify which cell you're actually getting
- Specify the cell manufacturer and model in the contract, not just the proposal
- Module serial numbers and a factory capacity test report
- IEC 62619, IEC 63056, and UN 38.3 certificates for the delivered batch
- Right to a factory acceptance audit (FAT) before shipment
- Capacity test after commissioning as an acceptance condition